Ubicación: Global + English
Global Global Algérie Français Algeria English Angola Português Angola English Argentina Español Argentina English Australia English Austria Deutsch Austria English Azerbaijan English Azerbaijan Русский Bahrain English Bangladesh English Belgium English Belgium Français Belgium Nederlands Brazil Português Brazil English Bulgaria български Bulgaria English Cameroon English Cameroon Français Canada English Canada Français Chile Español Chile English China 中文 China 日本語 China English Colombia Español Colombia English Croatia English Czech Republic Čeština Czech Republic English Denmark English Djibouti English Ecuador Español Ecuador English Egypt English Estonia English Ethiopia English Finland Suomi Finland English France Français France English Georgia English Georgia Русский Germany Deutsch Germany English Ghana English Greece Ελληνικά Greece English Guatemala Español Guatemala English Hong Kong, China English Hong Kong, China 中文 Hungary Magyar Hungary English India English Indonesia English Iraq English Ireland English Italy Italiano Italy English Ivory Coast Français Ivory Coast English Japan 日本語 Japan English Jordan English Kazakhstan Русский Kazakhstan English Kenya English Kuwait English Kyrgyzstan Русский Kyrgyzstan English Latvia English Lithuania English Malaysia English Mauritius English Mauritius français (Maurice) Mexico Español Mexico English Moldova Română Moldova English Mongolia English Morocco English Morocco Français Mozambique Português Mozambique English Netherlands Nederlands Netherlands English New Zealand English Nigeria English Norway English Oman English Pakistan English Paraguay Español Paraguay English Peru Español Peru English Philippines English Poland Polski Poland English Portugal Português Portugal English Qatar English Republic of Korea 한국어 Republic of Korea English Romania Română Romania English Saudi Arabia English Serbia Српски Serbia English Singapore English Slovakia English Slovenia English South Africa English Spain English Spain Español Sri Lanka English Sweden English Switzerland Deutsch Switzerland Français Switzerland Italiano Switzerland English Tanzania English Thailand ไทย Thailand English Togo English Togo Français Tunisia English Tunisia Français Türkiye Türkçe Türkiye English Turkmenistan Русский Turkmenistan English Ukraine Українська Ukraine English United Arab Emirates English United Kingdom English Uruguay Español Uruguay English USA English Uzbekistan English Uzbekistan Русский Vietnam Tiếng Việt Vietnam English

Skincare Product Moisturizing Efficacy Testing: Standards, Methods and Evaluation Process

Moisturizing efficacy testing provides objective, instrument-based evidence to substantiate hydration claims for skincare products such as creams, serums, lotions and facial masks. Accredited third-party laboratories conduct these evaluations on human volunteers under controlled environmental conditions, using corneometry and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurements in accordance with recognized standards such as GB/T 28249. This article explains the testing principles, applicable product categories, test protocols, instrumentation and acceptance criteria used to validate moisturizing performance.

Technical Overview

Moisturizing efficacy testing is a human-panel, bioengineering-based assessment designed to verify whether a skincare product measurably increases skin hydration and improves the skin barrier function. Because the stratum corneum hydration level cannot be judged reliably by visual inspection alone, electrical and evaporimetric instruments are used to quantify water content in the outermost skin layers and the rate of water loss through the skin surface.

The testing is typically performed by accredited third-party laboratories following recognized national and international references, including:

  • GB/T 28249-2012, the Chinese national guidance for the evaluation of moisturizing efficacy of cosmetics using capacitance-based skin hydration measurements.
  • EEMCO (European Group for Efficacy Measurements on Cosmetics) guidance documents on the measurement of stratum corneum hydration and transepidermal water loss.
  • EU Regulation 655/2013, which defines the common criteria (legal compliance, truthfulness, evidential support, honesty, fairness and informed decision-making) for cosmetic efficacy claims.
  • The efficacy claim substantiation requirements of the Chinese cosmetics supervisory regulation (CSAR), which require documented evidence for functional claims such as moisturizing.

The core measurement principle relies on the dielectric properties of the stratum corneum: because water has a very high dielectric constant compared with other skin components, changes in electrical capacitance or conductance at the skin surface correlate directly with changes in hydration. A complementary method, TEWL measurement, quantifies the diffusion of water vapor through the epidermis and reflects the integrity of the skin barrier.

Testing Samples

Creams, Lotions and Emulsions

Leave-on emulsion products are the most common category submitted for moisturizing efficacy testing. They are evaluated for both the magnitude of the hydration increase and the duration over which the effect is maintained after a single application.

Serums, Essences and Ampoules

Low-viscosity, high-actives formulations containing humectants such as glycerin, hyaluronic acid and betaine are tested to confirm rapid hydration performance and to compare performance against benchmark formulations.

Facial Masks

Sheet masks, sleeping masks and clay-based masks are assessed using application conditions that simulate real consumer use, with hydration measurements taken immediately after removal and at subsequent time points to characterize both the instant and residual moisturizing effect.

Toners, Mists and Hydrogel Products

Rinse-off and spray formats are tested to evaluate whether humectants remain effective on the skin after application, since volatile carriers may reduce the residence time of moisturizing agents.

Body, Hand and Lip Care Products

Body lotions, hand creams and lip balms are tested on the relevant anatomical sites, such as the forearm, the back of the hand and the lips, to substantiate site-specific hydration claims.

Testing Items

A complete moisturizing efficacy study generally includes the following measured parameters:

  • Stratum corneum hydration value (capacitance or conductance, in arbitrary units) before and after product application.
  • Moisture increase rate at each post-application time point, expressed as a percentage relative to baseline.
  • Effective moisturizing duration, defined as the time period during which hydration remains significantly elevated versus baseline and an untreated control site.
  • Transepidermal water loss (TEWL), in g/m2/h, as an indicator of skin barrier improvement.
  • Optional supplementary parameters: skin surface pH, skin elasticity and skin smoothness, depending on the product's full claim profile.
  • Long-term efficacy values obtained from multi-day (typically 14 to 28 days) consecutive-use studies.

Testing Methods

Panel Recruitment and Study Design

Studies are conducted with healthy adult volunteers, typically 20 to 30 valid subjects per GB/T 28249 practice, aged 18 to 65, with normal to dry skin in the test area. Volunteers with active eczema, skin allergies, severe sunburn or other dermatological conditions in the test region are excluded, as are pregnant or lactating women in most protocols. All participants provide written informed consent, and the study design is reviewed for ethical compliance before execution.

Environmental Control and Baseline Measurement

Because skin hydration readings are sensitive to ambient conditions, measurements are performed in a climate-controlled room at a temperature of approximately 20 to 22 degrees Celsius and relative humidity of 40 to 60 percent. Volunteers rest in the test room for at least 20 to 30 minutes before baseline readings to allow the skin surface to reach equilibrium. On the day of testing, volunteers must not apply any cosmetics to the test area.

Corneometry (Capacitance Method)

A corneometer with a capacitance probe is the reference instrument for stratum corneum hydration. The probe is pressed gently against the skin surface for approximately one second, and the reading reflects the water content of the outer 10 to 20 micrometers of the stratum corneum. Three to five replicate readings are taken at each marked test site, and the mean value is used for calculation. Conductance-based and dielectric instruments may be used as complementary methods to probe different skin depths.

TEWL Measurement

An open-chamber or closed-chamber evaporimeter is used to measure transepidermal water loss. A reduction in TEWL after product use indicates improved barrier function and better retention of water within the skin, which supports long-lasting moisturizing claims.

Application Protocol and Time Points

A fixed dose of the test product, commonly 2 mg/cm2, is applied to marked test sites on the volar forearm or the face, with an adjacent untreated site serving as the negative control. Measurement time points typically include 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 hours after a single application, and may be extended to 12 or 24 hours to substantiate long-duration claims. For continuous-use studies, volunteers apply the product at home for 14 to 28 days following a standardized usage regimen, with instrumental assessments performed on days 7, 14 and 28.

Data Analysis and Acceptance Criteria

The moisture increase rate at each time point is calculated as: moisture increase rate (%) = (Mt − M0) / M0 × 100, where M0 is the baseline value and Mt is the value at the given time point. Results are compared statistically against baseline and the untreated control using paired t-tests or analysis of variance. A product is considered to have demonstrated a moisturizing effect when the hydration increase is statistically significant (typically p < 0.05) at the defined time points and is maintained for the claimed duration.

Applications

Moisturizing efficacy test reports are used across the full product lifecycle:

  • Claim substantiation for marketing materials, live-stream commerce and e-commerce detail pages, ensuring that expressions such as moisturizing for 24 hours are supported by objective data.
  • Regulatory compliance, including efficacy claim documentation required for cosmetic product registration and filing in major markets.
  • Research and development support, allowing formulators to benchmark candidate formulas, screen humectant systems and optimize active ingredient concentrations.
  • Quality control and batch consistency verification for mature product lines.
  • Advertising audit defense, providing scientific evidence in response to regulatory inquiries or competitor challenges regarding hydration claims.

FAQ

How many volunteers are required for a moisturizing efficacy study?

Standard protocols use 20 to 30 valid subjects, which provides sufficient statistical power to detect meaningful hydration changes. Larger panels may be used when the expected effect is subtle or when subgroup analysis is required.

How long does the testing take?

A single-application efficacy study is usually completed within one day of panel measurements, with overall project duration of two to four weeks including recruitment and scheduling. Continuous-use studies of 14 to 28 days require six to eight weeks in total.

What result is needed to support a moisturizing claim?

The product must produce a hydration increase that is statistically significant compared with both baseline and an untreated control site, and the effect must persist for the duration claimed on the label. For duration-specific claims, such as 8-hour or 24-hour moisturization, measurements must cover the entire claimed period.

Can moisturizing efficacy be demonstrated without human testing?

Instrumental human-panel testing remains the recognized reference method for moisturizing claims. In vitro approaches, such as reconstructed human epidermis models and physical water-retention measurements, can provide supporting data during early formulation screening, but they are generally not sufficient as sole evidence for consumer-facing claims.

Is the test safe for volunteers?

Yes. The methods are non-invasive and painless, involving only gentle contact of measurement probes with the skin surface. Patch testing may be performed beforehand to rule out irritation if the formula contains novel actives.

Which products should undergo moisturizing efficacy testing?

Any cosmetic product for which a hydration or moisturizing claim is intended, including creams, lotions, serums, masks, toners, body care, hand care and lip care products, should be supported by an appropriate efficacy study before the claim is used commercially.

Why Choose ZKGX?

  • State-of-the-art analytical equipment
  • Highly qualified scientific team
  • Fast turnaround time
  • Competitive pricing